1. Technical Skills

  • Stroke Technique: How well does the player execute fundamental strokes (forehand, backhand, serve, volleys)?
  • (1) Poor
  • (2) Below Average
  • (3) Average
  • (4) Good
  • (5) Excellent
  • Footwork: How effective is the player’s movement and positioning on the court?
  • (1) Slow/Inconsistent
  • (2) Needs Improvement
  • (3) Adequate
  • (4) Quick/Consistent
  • (5) Exceptional
  • Consistency: How often does the player maintain control during rallies?
  • (1) Rarely
  • (2) Occasionally
  • (3) Moderately
  • (4) Consistently
  • (5) Always

2. Tactical Understanding

  • Match Strategy: How well does the player adapt strategies based on the opponent’s play?
  • (1) Poor Adaptation
  • (2) Needs Improvement
  • (3) Adequate
  • (4) Good Adaptation
  • (5) Excellent Strategic Thinking
  • Point Construction: How effectively does the player construct points and execute winning shots?
  • (1) Rarely Constructs Points
  • (2) Needs Work
  • (3) Average
  • (4) Good Point Construction
  • (5) Excellent Point Builder

3. Mental Toughness

  • Focus and Resilience: How focused is the player during matches, especially in tough situations?
  • (1) Easily Distracted
  • (2) Struggles with Focus
  • (3) Average
  • (4) Focused
  • (5) Always Focused and Resilient
  • Decision-Making: How quick and effective are the player’s decisions on the court?
  • (1) Poor
  • (2) Slow Decisions
  • (3) Adequate
  • (4) Quick Decisions
  • (5) Excellent Decision-Making

4. Physical Conditioning

  • Endurance: How well does the player sustain energy and performance during long matches?
  • (1) Tires Quickly
  • (2) Below Average
  • (3) Moderate Endurance
  • (4) Good Stamina
  • (5) Excellent Endurance
  • Speed and Agility: How quick and agile is the player when reacting to shots and moving around the court?
  • (1) Slow
  • (2) Needs Improvement
  • (3) Adequate
  • (4) Quick
  • (5) Exceptionally Fast and Agile
  • Strength: How powerful are the player’s serves and groundstrokes?
  • (1) Weak
  • (2) Needs More Power
  • (3) Average
  • (4) Strong
  • (5) Exceptionally Powerful

5. Experience and Context

  • Age of Player: What is the player’s age group?
  • (1) 5–7 years old
  • (2) 8–10 years old
  • (3) 11–13 years old
  • (4) 14–16 years old
  • (5) 17–18 years old
  • Hours of Coaching: How many hours per week is the player receiving professional coaching?
  • (1) 1–2 hours
  • (2) 3–4 hours
  • (3) 5–6 hours
  • (4) 7–8 hours
  • (5) 9+ hours
  • Practice Hours: How many hours per week does the player spend practicing independently or in organized sessions?
  • (1) 1–2 hours
  • (2) 3–4 hours
  • (3) 5–6 hours
  • (4) 7–8 hours
  • (5) 9+ hours
  • Parents’ Tennis Experience: Have the player’s parents played tennis, and at what level?
  • (1) No Tennis Experience
  • (2) Recreational
  • (3) Club Level
  • (4) Collegiate Level
  • (5) Professional/Advanced Competitive Level

6. Tournament and Ranking Performance

  • Match Results: How does the player perform in matches or tournaments against similarly skilled opponents?
  • (1) Rarely Wins
  • (2) Wins Occasionally
  • (3) Wins About Half
  • (4) Wins Frequently
  • (5) Always Wins
  • Ranking (if available): What is the player’s ranking, if applicable (local, national, or international)?
  • (1) Unranked
  • (2) Local Ranking
  • (3) Regional Ranking
  • (4) National Ranking
  • (5) Top National/International Ranking
  • Tournament Participation: How frequently does the player participate in competitive tournaments?
  • (1) Rarely
  • (2) Occasionally
  • (3) Monthly
  • (4) Weekly
  • (5) Several Tournaments per Month

7. Coach’s Evaluation

  • Overall Assessment of Strengths: Based on the coach's experience, how would you rate the player’s current strengths in tennis?
  • (1) Needs Significant Improvement
  • (2) Below Average
  • (3) Average
  • (4) Above Average
  • (5) Outstanding
  • Areas for Improvement: Based on the coach's experience, how would you rate the player's room for growth?
  • (1) High Room for Growth
  • (2) Needs Significant Work
  • (3) Average
  • (4) Minor Adjustments Needed
  • (5) Close to Mastery

8. Passion and Commitment

  • Practice Intensity: How focused and intense are the player’s training sessions?
  • (1) Little Effort
  • (2) Inconsistent Effort
  • (3) Moderate
  • (4) Focused
  • (5) Highly Intense and Dedicated
  • Dedication: How consistent is the player’s commitment to training and improving?
  • (1) Low Commitment
  • (2) Inconsistent
  • (3) Average
  • (4) Highly Dedicated
  • (5) Extremely Dedicated and Passionate

Scoring Guide

Once the responses are collected, tally the scores across all sections. Use the following as a general guide for interpretation:

  • 35–60: Developing stage. Focus on foundational skills and building experience.
  • 61–80: Intermediate level. Player shows promise but needs more training and match experience.
  • 81–100: Advanced level. Player is highly skilled and competitive with strong potential for future success.
  • 101–120: Super Advanced. Player has exceptional skills and is likely to compete at a high level nationally or internationally.